The FBI indicates 3.7% rise in violent crimes throughout the USA during the first six months of 2006 in their ‘Preliminary Semiannual Uniform Crime Report’ (www.fbi.gov/publications.htm). This data, categorized by city’s of 100,000 and over in population, can be a valuable tool to law enforcement agency partners in their prevention of violent crime, murder, forcible rape, robbery, aggravated assault, property crime, burglary, larceny, motor vehicle theft and arson.

The FBI’s investigations delve into every aspect of citizen health care including, but not limited to, false billings, psychiatric and acute care, supply company products, durable medical equipment, pharmacies and laboratories, internet and black market drug sales, etc. Health Care Fraud can potentially cause unnecessary illness or death as a result of fake prescriptions/tests and create substantial losses to Medicare, Medicaid and health care insurers.

The FBI’s ‘Financial Crimes Section,’ in partnership with 200+ Governmental Agencies, Task Forces, private industries and the SEC, investigates 24/7 to uncover falsification of Corporate asset information, money laundering, deceptive accounting entries, bogus hedge and inside trades, self-dealing tax violations, etc. From October 2001 through 2006 the Corporate Fraud Task force has pursued and “obtained 2,962 indictments/information’s, 2,569 convictions and restitution totaling over $14.9 billion related to Corporate and Securities Fraud.”

Even while we sleep, FBI Agents and task forces within departments too numerous to name here are working to fulfill their commitment to solve and resolve crimes which impact the lives of USA citizens and the financial well being of the nation.

Law enforcement agencies attributing to this thorough ‘Preliminary Semiannual Uniform Crime Report’ issued by Robert S. Mueller III, Director, Federal Bureau of Investigation, are listed below:

Advisory: Criminal Justice Information Systems Committee, International Association of Chiefs of Police; Criminal Justice Information Services Committee, National Sheriffs’ Association; Criminal Justice Information Services Advisory Policy Board

Betty Jo Sheley, http://www.showlinehomesecurity.com Owner Security Products website for Home and Personal Protection. Author participated in Mayoral Conflict Resolution Institute, Community Think Tank Studies. Advise Author of article reprint including my link.

If you’re a sole practitioner or work in a small law firm, you may find that you need occasional administrative support on a part-time basis. Working with a Virtual Assistant (VA) may be just what you are looking for.

There are several advantages to working with a VA vs. a full-time, in-house assistant. Since a VA is an independent contractor, there is no need for extra office space or equipment, and no need to pay taxes, insurance or fringe benefits. And studies have shown that the real cost of hiring and keeping a full-time, in-house assistant is 2 to 2 ½ times the cost of his or her salary. When you work with a VA, the only cost to you is ‘time on task.’ Simply write one check a month, and you’re done.

A VA works with clients from his or her home office in an ongoing capacity, sometimes charging hourly, sometimes via retainer, handling various administrative tasks as needed. Because the VA does not work in the client’s office, it is important to note that the relationship between the client and the VA is extremely important. Communication happens via phone, email, fax, and sometimes instant messaging. Documents are shared through email, fax, or through remote programs such as GoToMyPC (http://www.gotomypc.com) or PC Anywhere (http://www.pcanywhere.com). These remote programs are generally easy to use, and your VA can even help you get set up to work remotely. Also, materials for projects can be sent directly to the VA’s office when necessary; for example, to handle a bulk mailing of brochures.

As an attorney you might find that your typical day involves making and answering phone calls and email, scheduling and attending meetings and appointments, court appearances, invoicing clients, and the list goes on. A VA could simplify things for you by keeping your calendar up-to-date, screening your voice mail and email messages, setting up meetings and appointments for you, invoicing your clients, and even sending out greeting cards to your clients, family and friends. All of this allows you the time to handle the most important aspects of growing and maintaining your practice.

Some of the tasks a VA will typically handle include:

• Invoicing clients

• Small or bulk mailings
• Making appointments
• Keeping your calendar up to date
• Screening email
• Handling voice mail and/or email, responding on your behalf
• Managing contact databases
• Maintaining your web site
• Submitting press releases and/or articles
• Planning meetings
• Making travel arrangements
• Internet research
• Birthday or holiday cards for family/friends/clients
• Online shopping for client gifts

Allowing a VA to handle these kinds of daily details will allow you the time to focus on what you do best, and what is important to you. To get started working with a VA, there is usually a 30-minute phone consultation, where each party interviews the other to determine if there is a good fit for a working relationship.

Your time is valuable, and a Virtual Assistant can help you save a lot of that time on a regular basis. Aren’t your practice and your peace of mind worth it?

© 2007 Cynthia Morse, Virtually At Your Service. All rights reserved.

Cynthia Morse CAP is a Virtual Assistant, and the owner of Virtually At Your Service, http://www.virtuallyatyourservice.biz
She offers top-notch administrative support to small business owners and other busy professionals from her home office, allowing them the time to focus on what they love and do best. Visit her blog, ‘Virtual Biz Connection’,
http://virtuallyatyourservice.typepad.com/virtualbizconnection It’s full of tips, helpful articles and resources for your small business!

There are many unanswered questions I have about 9/11. As someone who worked on ground zero, in New York City, the first week immediately after the attack, I can truly say I love my country and am patriotic. I drove a rental car from Florida up to ground zero to work, when all the airports were shut down.

Minutes before President Bush arrived days after the attack and gave his ground zero speech, the response of the firemen, NYPD, and rescue workers was electric. They were all gathered around, some standing on bulldozers and heavy equipment, shouting “USA! USA! USA!” It was undoubtedly my most patriotic moment as an American.

President Bush said, “Whoever knocked these buildings down is going to hear from all of us.” What is eery about 9/11 are all of the unanswered questions, inconsistencies of information, and the Bush administration’s concealment of the truth. By withdrawing and withholding information about Saudi Arabia and Venice, FL pertinent to the events surrounding 9/11, President George W. Bush and Governor Jeb Bush of Florida make themselves equally suspect.

It is no news that President Bush likes to kiss and hold hands with the Saudi royal family. The Bush family has always been drawn to and involved with oil. Considering Saudi Arabia was particularly interested in Iraqi oil and protecting their Sunni brothers in Babylon, it was they who gave Bush & Co. the idea to invade Iraq in 2003. President Bush was considering invading Iraq long before 9/11. VP Cheney consistently answers to the Saudi royal family. Remember his rush visit in 2006, when he was beckoned by the Saudi king to bring Thanksgiving leftovers on Friday - a one day emergency visit to discuss Iraq and Saudi interests in the region.

This being said, it is no surprise why the Bush administration would want to remove documents detailing Saudi involvement in 9/11. The other unanswered questions of importance to me are why Mohamed Atta and his men were frequenting in Venice, FL. Venice is 2nd in the State of Florida for an elderly populace. Why would Mohamed Atta and his men choose to base their operation out of Venice?

Go to Blockbuster and rent the DVD “Conspiracy - The Secret History: Mohamed Atta & the Venice Flying Circus” and see for yourself.

It is known fact that Atta and the boys liked to frequent strip clubs in Miami, Sarasota, Daytona Beach, and Las Vegas. These guys weren’t your typical Muslims and by no means were devout in their faith. They hung out at Harry’s Bar in New York by the piano. They drank rum and vodka for hours.

Atta and his flying circus spoke very good English, dressed impeccably, carried briefcases, and were the perfect consumers. Before the attack of 9/11 they returned the rental car they had got at Warwick Rental Car Enterprise, which interestingly isn’t listed in the yellow pages, neither is it registered as a business in the state of Florida. Warwick sounds like a business operation the CIA would be involved in. Atta & company rented two cars over five weeks from the rental agency.

Arab pilots flooded Venice, FL to attend two flight schools for a year. Both flight schools were Dutch owned and operated. Interestingly enough, the FBI’s timeline on Mohamed Atta and his conspirators in aviation never mentioned Venice. The FBI knew of terrorists training at Rudi Dekkers flight school for quite some time.

Just how badly did the CIA want to cover up Venice in their investigation? Pretty earnestly by the looks of Florida Governor Jeb Bush on board of a military cargo plane with two Rider trucks full of documents from Rudi Dekkers flight school where Atta and the gang were flying. The FBI never got to finish the investigation of Venice and the Dekkers flight school as President George W. Bush halted their investigation and redirected their attention to working on anthrax. It kind of makes you wonder if just maybe the CIA was behind the anthrax debacle to sidetrack the FBI elsewhere away from the biggest 9/11 crime scene in Venice?

Some aviation companies to investigate which use each others names often “doing business as” (DBA) who were involved with Arab pilots and have very probable CIA links are:
- Casablanca Air
- FLAir
- Huffman Aviation
- Jones Aviation (Sarasota, FL)
- Florida Flight Training Center
- Sunrise Airlines (Las Vegas, NV)
- Express Air (Phoenix, AZ)

The Washington Post on September 15 verified Mohamed Atta attended aerospace school in Alabama and a naval air station in Pensacola, FL.

Some say the foreknowledge issue is a red herring. Many allege the “Islamic Brigades” are a creation of the CIA and that Al Qaeda is categorized as an “intelligence asset”. It is believed by some that supporting to terrorist organizations is an integral part of U.S. foreign policy, legitimizing and necessitating our ongoing clandestine operations.

The Venice Municipal Airport sure shut its mouth when investigations about Ruddi Dekkers became commonplace. It kind of suspiciously reminds me of Barry Seal and the drug dealings of Mena, Arkansas. Rudi’s big backer in Naples, FL enabled a guy who was behind on his rent to quickly become a successful businessman rolling in the millions. As for the two Dutch nationals, they both purchased their flight schools the same year before all the Arabs began showing up for training. Interesting coincidences indeed.

The Gondolier Sun in Venice, FL called it “Evil in Our Backyard.” A Sarasota county interdiction order told everybody to stay away from the Venice operation as it was “governmentally protected.” It seems the Bush’s also vacation in Venice. Perhaps this explains for the 23 helicopters that disappeared over time in Charlotte county.

Ironically Rudi Dekkers was later called upon to advice Congress on how to combat terrorism within the aviation industry. Not bad for a guy charged of sexual harassment of an 18 y/o girl.

It seems Ringling Brothers Circus, the OSS (a precursor to the CIA), and the Italian American Club all have strong ties to Venice, FL.

According to Ex-Director of the CIA, Richard Helms, who testified during the Cold War, the agency has the largest aviation company and fleet in the world.

Maybe this explains why President George W. Bush sat quietly and read “My Pet Goat” for several minutes after being informed of the attack in New York City (NYC). He thought it was more important to smoke cigars with Prince Bandar of Saudi before he went to ground zero to assess the damage.

Marvin Bush headed security at the world trade center in New York City. Go to YouTube and watch videos of the attack and you can hear an explosion several minutes after the planes had already crashed. Many firemen and people down below in the towers also mention hearing explosions. Moreover some people who worked at the world trade center mentioned security keeping them out at night for about two weeks preceding the attack while special security “procedures and protocol” were being taken.

Some believe the building was demolished and an inside job altogether. Building # 7 was unnecessarily “pulled’ as demolitionists call it. No planes hit it, but since a sizeable insurance policy had been taken on the towers and the classified documents of stealth organizations were located therein, many had good reason to “pull it” to cover themselves.

When things don’t seem to make sense, remember maybe they do in another way.

If you have any further insight, info, interesting links, data, and documents concerning 9/11 please send them to me.

Paul Davis is a worldwide minister, advocate for truth & justice, and investigative journalist.

Paul is the author of several books including his pre-9/11 book A State of Emergency; Breakthrough for a Broken Heart; Adultery: 101 Reasons Not to Cheat; Are You Ready for True Love; Stop Lusting & Start Living; Waves of God; Supernatural Fire; Poems that Propel the Planet; and God vs. Religion.

Paul’s compassion for people & passion to travel has taken him to over 50 countries of the world where he has had a tremendous impact. Paul has served in many war-torn, impoverished and tsunami stricken regions of the earth. His Dream-Maker Inc. is building dreams, breaking limitations & reviving nations.

Paul’s Breakthrough Seminars inspire, revive, awaken, impregnate with purpose, impart the fire of desire, catapult people into a new level of self-awareness, facilitate destiny discovery and dream fulfillment.

Contact Paul to minister, speak at your event or for coaching:

RevivingNations@yahoo.com, 407-284-1705.

http://www.DreamMakerMinistries.com
http://www.CreativeCommunications.TV

In Michigan, as in other states, the broader the no-compete clause, the less enforceable the no-compete clause will be. On the other hand, the more an employee has access to confidential information, trade secrets and the payment of additional compensation for a non-compete clause increases the likelihood of no-compete enforcement in court.

To enforce a non-compete, an employer must have a legitimate business interest to protect. In addition, an employer’s reasonable competitive business interest must also be more than merely competition. These include protection of trade secrets, proprietary information, and competitive position. Taking insider information by an employee, which would lead to an “unfair advantage” to the employee, is key.

Unfair advantage, however, is more than just competition. A non-compete is subject to attack when the employee does not use the trade secrets but only his general knowledge or things he has learned from experience.

Another issue in many of these cases is solicitation of customers. Oftentimes, employers will include a contract clause that prohibits an employee from providing services or contacting customers of the employer. Courts are more likely to enforce non-solicitation clauses than no-contact or no-service clauses. This is because courts view these clauses to be anti-trust violations and otherwise anti-competitive since it takes the choice away from the consumer.

At best, the distinction between solicitation and non-solicitation is somewhat artificial and subjective. Customer letters and phone calls are obviously direct solicitation. Newspaper advertisements typically are not considered solicitation and leave the customer choice intact.

Enrico Schaefer is the founding attorney of Traverse Legal, PLC, a law firm specializing in non-compete agreements, trade secret and non-solicitation litigation. If you have an issue involving non-compete contracts, trade secret theft, customer list theft or breach of fiduciary duties by corporate mangers, officers or owners, our lawyers can provide you the legal advice you need to fully protect your rights.

Paternity fraud is once again in the news, as the state of Tennessee is on the brink of becoming a trend-setter state with proposed legislation that would allow for the disestablishment of parentage.

Paternity fraud is the popular name for the situation where a man is “duped” into fatherhood for a child that is not biologically related. The big issue with paternity fraud is that a man is forced to pay child support for these children even after DNA evidence proves that he is not the biological father. The majority of states rely on an English common law doctrine that creates a presumption of fatherhood when a child is born during a marriage or 300 days after divorce. The current purpose of this doctrine is to prevent the state welfare system from paying to support the child.

While the mother-child relationship is generally established at birth; the father-child relationship is harder to establish. When the common law doctrine of paternity was first established over 500 years ago, there was no scientific test that could prove paternity. With the advent of DNA testing, the old presumption has become antiquated. The majority of states have failed to reevaluate their paternity laws and have kept the old presumption in place.

Tennessee is currently considering a law that would allow for the disestablishment of parentage. The proposed bill would amend the current law and allow a man to escape child support obligations if he can show through DNA evidence that he is not the biological father. The new paternity law would not allow reimbursement for child support that has already been paid and would only apply to future child support payments. In addition, the law would not allow disestablishment of parentage in three situations. These are:

1. If the father legally had adopted the child.
2. If the father has entered into a voluntary acknowledgement of paternity.
3. If at the time a child support order was granted by a court, the man had actual knowledge that he was not the father.

If the paternity fraud bill becomes law, Tennessee would be one of a handful of states that allows a man to stop paying child support when he can prove he is not the biological father. Attempts to change the presumption of paternity have met with strong resistance from groups in many states. The majority of the arguments against changing the law address that if the duped dad is let off the hook for child support, it is the child that becomes the victim. Opponents to the new law submit that the child’s best interest should be the only concern.

Supporters of the paternity fraud bill argue that fraud should never be rewarded. They point out that these cases often arise because the woman has concealed a sexual relationship from her husband. They submit that the current law excuses the woman’s conduct and creates a new victim.

Scott Justice is an attorney practicing family law in Tennessee. He is the author of Tennessee Divorce and Family Law located at http://www.justiceondivorce.com

Whether you have a DUI in Another State or Your State, it’s important to know that a DUI can stay on your record for up to 10 years. Therefore, don’t dwell on your situation, but focus on getting all of the information that you can in order to help yourself . Your first and foremost Goal is going to be to either expunge (completely remove) your DUI/DWI or Greatly Minimize the Damage to your personal life.

Know this, right after your Drunk Driving Arrest, your drivers license is still valid. Even though you may have been given a temporary or paper license, your DMV record will not have the charge recorded, yet.

Put two and two together. You have a small period of time to get a “clean” Legal License before the damage is done.

If you haven’t been convicted, Consider This Premier Defense Strategy Used by Many High Powered Attorney’s called the “RISING BAC THEORY”.

According to The Information Association, LLC;

The Rising BAC theory (also known as the subtractive retrograde theory) is a very effective defense strategy in some states and less effective in others. It depends o the judge and wheter or not the court recognizes the theory but scientific evidence proves that this is completely accurate beyond a shadow of a doubt.

The idea behind it is due to the passage of time between alcohol consumption (when you last drank) and when it actually shows up in your blood stream. You see, it is only a crime to drive with a BAC of 0.08 or over, NOT to CONSUME enough alcohol to have a BAC of 0.08 or greater.

So, if a person consumes enough of an alcoholic beverage to put them over the legal limit immediately before driving, then they et into a car and drive 10 minutes down the road to their home and go to bed…the alcohol never had time to enter their blood stream to raise their BAC over the legal imit while they were driving.

So even though they consumed excessive amounts of alcohol, the did not drive with a BAC of over 0.08 (which is the legal limit).

They were home before the alcohol had a chance to “seep” into their blood. In essence, no crime was ever committed because the way the law reads, YOU MUT ACTUALLY BE DRIVING WITH A BAC over the legal limit. (0.08)

And it takes time for that to happen….like a couple of hours. So…

The problem comes I with the police officer who pulls you over for suspicion of drunk driving. He keeps you at the scene for an hour or more, and then brings you down to the station to blow into the Intoxilyzer 5000 breath machine. Now it’s been 2 hours since you were actually driving!

If you had consumed alcohol immediately before driving, the alcohol WAS NOT in your blood stream when you were actually driving, but by the time you ended up blowing into the Intoxilyzer Machine (2 hours after you were driving) at the police station, the alcohol has now been fully absorbed into your blood (due to passage of time) and will register on the test.

But you weren’t driving with that amount of alcohol in your blood, you were at the police station with that amount of alcohol in your blood.

So technically the crime you committed was blowing into an Intoxilyzer with a BAC of 0.08 or greater, NOT DRIVING WITH A BAC OF 0.08 OR GREATER! And it’s certainly not a crime to blow into a machine over the legal limit. It’s a crime to drive an automobile over the legal limit.

Do you see the rationale behind this theory? It’s very persuasive and effective!

This DUI Article is not to be construed as Legal Advice in Any Way, Shape or Form. You Should always seek the advice of a competent, qualified, attorney when making any Legal Decision. You should also have access to behind the scenes information so that your best interests are being met at all times.

For 3 Steps to Get a Clean Drivers License after Being Pulled over for a DUI go to http://tinyurl.com/269vt7
If You Want The Most Up to Date DUI Strategies From The Most Respected DUI Attorneys’ in Practice Today Then go to http://tinyurl.com/269vt7 Don’t Let a DUI Ruin Your Life. Protect Your Rights NOW!

Question: Should I negotiate with the insurance adjuster myself without the help of an attorney in order to settle a Rhode Island personal injury, slip and fall or automobile / auto / car accident case?

Answers: No. Representing yourself and negotiating with an insurance adjuster is usually not a good idea! Because you are not an attorney and have not handled personal injury matters before, you are often not aware of the full value of your case. The insurance adjuster may take advantage of your inexperience. Insurance adjusters typically will offer a lot less money to a person representing themselves than they would to an attorney representing a client. (Article by David Slepkow 401-437-1100)

Furthermore, when you are representing yourself in a Rhode Island personal injury or slip and fall case, the insurance company knows that you do not know how to litigate a lawsuit. Therefore you don’t have as much leverage with the insurance adjuster.

Question: How do Rhode Island personal injury lawyers charge for personal injury /automobile/ car accident and slip and fall cases?

Answer: Most lawyers In Rhode Island take personal injury, premises liability, dog bite cases, slip and fall and auto / car accidents on a contingent fee basis. Article by David slepkow (401-437-1100) This means that the lawyers do not collect any fees unless they are successful in settling your personal injury case or winning a verdict at trial. The lawyer typically will take the case costs from the settlement or verdict at the end of the case. Most attorneys advance case costs.

Question: If I hire a Rhode Island personal injury attorney, how does the process work?

Answer: You should retain a RI personal injury lawyer as soon as possible after the automobile or other accident. At the first meeting, the attorney typically will get all the important information concerning the accident including, but not limited to, the names of the witnesses, all injuries and the treating physician and doctors.

The attorney may want to visit the actual scene of the accident or slip and fall so that he can get further prospective on how the accident occurred. If the case is a slip and fall case, the lawyer should visit the scene of the accident if possible and interview potential witnesses. If you have any pictures of the accident scene, your damaged automobile, or of the resulting injuries, it is usually a good idea to show those to the lawyer.

If your lawyer is interested in taking the case, he or she will typically enter into a contingent fee personal injury fee agreement with you. You will need to provide a list of the names and addresses of all witnesses. Your lawyer will also ask you for the names and addresses of all treating physicians and the names and addresses of all hospitals and treating facilities. The lawyer will ask you to sign medical releases pursuant to federal law which will allow your lawyer to collect your medical bills and medical records from your health care provider concerning your injury.

The attorney will be very interested in knowing whether or not you have health insurance and the extent of your health insurance coverage. If your health insurance plan is covering your medical bills, they typically have a lien against any settlement proceeds you receive. It is necessary for your lawyer on your behalf to repay your health insurance company from the proceeds of any settlement or verdict that you receive. These liens typically can be negotiated with the health insurance company. Some insurance companies will typically lower their lien 25% to 33% to account for the work that your attorney has done on the case.

Sometimes, if liability or damage are in dispute, you can get a further reduction of the lien. Typically your lawyer will not be able to disburse any monies to you until he has paid the insurance company for the lien amount.

After the initial consultation and after you have retained the personal injury lawyer, the lawyer will typically do an investigation, if necessary, by calling witnesses, reviewing police reports, or doing anything else that is necessary to further your case. The attorney may need to read relevant Rhode Island negligence case law to evaluate the merits of your perspnal injury case. The attorney will collect your medical records and billing records. Obtaining your billing records for the accident from the medical providers is extremely important because the amount of medical bills that you have is a very important factor in determining the ultimate value of your case for settlement or trial purposes.

Your attorney typically will wait until he/she believes that you have reached a certain point in your medical treatment before he makes an offer to the insurance company to settle your personal injury case. Attorneys are typically concerned that they will settle the case prior to knowing the full extent of a person’s injuries. After an automobile accident case is settled and the release is signed, there is no way to get paid any further damages even if your injuries become substantially more severe. Therefore, it is usually not a good idea to settle the personal injury case prior to having some idea as to the extent of your injuries in the future. Your back, neck, shoulder or leg injury could get worse as time goes bye.

After the lawyer meets with you, he will typically send a letter of representation to all the insurance companies involved giving them general information about the case. The insurance company will open up a personal injury case file and respond to your attorney. Insurance companies are required by law to investigate the facts and look into the potential personal injury cause of action. When the attorney is comfortable that the right time has arrived, he or she will typically send a settlement package to the insurance company. This settlement letter usually includes an evaluation of the permanency of the injury, if any, and describes the pain and suffering of the client as well as any lost wages and medical bills incurred. The attorney typically includes in the settlement package an initial demand for settlement of the case.

The insurance company will usually reply to the letter with either an offer to settle the case or a denial of liability. If the insurance company is denying liability in the persoanl injury case and refusing to pay anything, then the attorney will have no choice but to file a lawsuit to seek damages. In the event that a settlement offer is made to the attorney, there usually will be a period of negotiation to see if the parties can agree to a settlement amount.

If the parties cannot agree to a settlement amount, it may be necessary to file a personal injury/ negligence law suit in either any of the Rhode Island District Courts or Rhode Island Superior Court. In Rhode Island (RI), most personal injury, automobile accident, premises liability and slip and fall cases are handled in Rhode Island Superior Court because matters over $10,000.00 in Rhode Island must be heard in Superior Court.

Question: My Rhode Island personal injury attorney is unable to settle my car accident case with the insurance adjuster, then what happens next?

Answer: If the attorney is unable to settle the case with the insurance adjuster, then it is necessary to file a lawsuit in court. The process of a Rhode Island personal injury civil lawsuit can take up to a few years to resolve. Your lawyer will file a complaint in court alleging negligence or other causes of action asking the court to award you damages. After the complaint is filed, the insurance company will typically hire an attorney to represent their insured. The insurance company’s lawyer will file an answer to the case.

After the complaint and answer are filed, there is usually a discovery period. The parties can send interrogatories to each other which are written questions that the other party must answer. The parties can also take depositions of witnesses which is when the other lawyer asks you questions about the case in front of a stenographer. After the discovery period, there may be a motion to dismiss or motions for summary judgment that are filed by either of the parties.

If the case is not dismissed or summarily decided, then the case will proceed to trial. The average amount of time for a law suit in Rhode Island is about two years, although the amount of time for the law suit could vary depending on how complex the case is, availability of witnesses, and the amount of cases on the docket.

Question: How do I obtain evidence of my personal injury in Rhode Island?

Answer: Please take photographs of all injuries including , but not limited to, cuts, bruises and broken bones. Do not wait too long after the accident. Please do the best that you can to obtain the witness names, addresses, phone numbers, and other information to give to your Rhode Island personal injury attorney. Please keep records of your out-of-pocket expenses for your medical bills, lost wages and other expenses incurred such as medication and medical accessories. You need to keep accurate records because you will need to provide them to the insurance company. If your injury was caused by a whiplash injury caused by a rear end accident you may need to hire an expert to testify on your behalf as to the seriousness of upper and lower back injuries caused by whiplash.

Question: Will my Rhode Island personal injury lawyer keep what I tell him confidential?

Answer: In Rhode Island there is an attorney-client privilege. Your attorney is precluded from disclosing confidential information that you do not want him to disclose to others. There is certain limited exceptions to the attorney-client privilege which usually do not apply.

Question: What type of costs are typically incurred in Rhode Island (RI) personal injury cases?

Answer: Out-of-pocketcosts, are expenses that are incurred by your lawyer to properly settle or litigate your case. The out of pocket expenses are usually advanced by the lawyer. Medical providers usually charge a nominal fee to copy your medical records. Most doctors also charge a fee to write a comprehensive medical report detailing your course of treatment, injury prognosis and whether or not your injuries are permanent. If it is necessary to have a doctor testify at the trial of your case, then the doctor may charge a substantial fee for his attendance.

Another example of out-of-pocket expenses that you may incur is a filing fee to file the complaint in Providence / kent / Newport or Washington County Superior Court and the fee for service of process of the personal injury complaint.

The amount of costs incurred in your case varies from case to case and depend on how complex your persoanl injury case is. The more serious your injuries are the more out of pocket expenses that may be incurred. Most attorneys will get prior approval before incurring a substantial cost on your behalf.

Rhode Island Personal Injury, automobile accident, slip and fall and premises liability law lawyer, David Slepkow has been practicing law for ten years. David Slepkow is a lawyer and partner at Slepkow Slepkow & Associates, Inc. in East Providence, Rhode Island. Slepkow Slepkow & Associates, Inc. was established in 1932 and is currently celebrating its 75th anniversary! Attorney, David Slepkow is a member of the Rhode Island (RI) and Massachusetts (MA) Bar Association and the Bar for the Federal Court First Circuit, District of Rhode Island. If necessary, David can arrange weekend and evening consults. David never charges any fee for personal injury case, automobile / auto/ car accidents and slip & fall cases unless sucessfull. David Slepkow is a member of the Family Law Inns of Court and the Rhode Island Trial Lawyers Association. You can contact David Slepkow at http://www.slepkowlaw.com or by calling him at 401-437-1100.

This article explains pleas and sentencing in Rhode Island (RI) for criminal misdemeanors. If you are charged with a misdemeanor crime in Rhode Island you should read this legal article very carefully. However, do not use this article as a substitute for seeking independent legal advice from a lawyer. This article was written by attorney, David Slepkow 401-437-1100.

A misdemeanor is any offense punishable by up to one year in Jail. Typical misdemeanors are: driving under the influence of alcohol (dui / dwi), shoplifting, domestic assault, Second (2nd) offense refusal to take the breathalyzer, driving on a suspended license, writing bad checks, domestic vandalism, simple assault and battery, domestic disorderly, reckless driving, disorderly conduct, etc. There are different rules that apply to driving with suspended licenses and this article does not fully address those provisions.

It is a very bad idea for a person to represent themselves (pro-se) in a criminal case. Please note that this article only applies to Rhode Island misdemeanor offenses and does not apply to any other states!

At the arraignment, A person should almost always say not guilty and hire an attorney. If a person cannot afford a lawyer then the person should go to the Public Defender. After the arraignment the matter will be set for a pretrial conference a couple of weeks later. In some very limited circumstances a person can work out a plea deal at the arraignment. It is usually a very bad idea for a person to enter into a plea agreement without an attorney.

At the pretrial conference a person can change their plea after meeting with the prosecutor and or the judge and after finding out what the prosecutor is offering for a a sentence. A defendant can negotiate with the prosecutor through their lawyer. If a plea agreement cannot be worked out at the pretrial conferences the matter will be set for trial. The matter also could be scheduled for motions prior to the trial if motions are requested.

A person should never change their plea from not guilty to nolo contendere or guilty without a plea deal from the prosecutor.

In Rhode Island, a defendant can enter one of four pleas: guilty, not guilty, nolo contendere or an “alfred plea”.

Guilty and Not Guilty Pleas

The pleas of guilty and not guilty are obvious. If the plea is not guilty then the matter will be scheduled for a trial on the merits in which the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the person is guilty of the alleged offense. The person will be presumed innocent and it is the prosecutions burden to prove that the person is guilty. Usually, it is a very very bad idea to take a guilty plea! Guilty pleas or a finding of guilt after a trial is always a criminal conviction in Rhode Island.

Nolo Contendere Plea

Nolo contendere means a person is not contesting the charges. When a defendant takes a nolo contendere plea in Rhode island, the defendant is indicting that he does not want to contest the charges but is also essentially admitting to the charges.

What is the difference between a guilty plea and a nolo contendere plea in rhode Island? There is a huge difference! A guilty plea is always a criminal conviction under Rhode Island law. A criminal conviction has major negative implications especially when a person applies for employment. A plea of nolo contendere may not constitute a criminal conviction in Rhode Island. A plea of nolo contendere is only a conviction in Rhode Island if there is a sentence of confinement (such as the ACI or home confinement), a suspended sentence or a fine imposed.

For example, A plea of nolo contendere with a sentence of probation and a contribution to the violent crimes indemnity fund or court costs will not constitute a conviction under Rhode Island law! For example, A plea of nolo contendere with a sentence of a filing and a contribution to the violent crimes indemnity fund (vcif) will not constitute a conviction under Rhode Island law.

However, anything with a fine attached to it will be a conviction under Rhode Island law. Therefore, it is important that the defendant gets either no fine or a contribution to the victims fund or court costs rather then a fine.

All misdeameanor plea agreements in Rhode lsland should be nolo contendere with court costs or a contribution towards the victims indemnity fund rather then guilty pleas!

Alfred Pleas

Alfred Pleas are strongly disfavored by judges in Rhode Island (RI) and are difficult to get. Alfred pleas derive from a United States Supreme Court case. In an Alfred plea, a defendant will admit that the state has sufficient evidence to convict him or her if the case went to trial but will not admit to anything.

DUI / Drunk Driving charges

In Rhode Island, any plea to drunk driving, driving under the influence, DUI/ DWI is a conviction under Rhode Island law. A breathalyzer refusal plea of guilty or “admitting to sufficient facts” is not a criminal conviction because a breathalyzer refusal is a civil case. For more information concerning Rhode Island drunk driving / dui and breathalyzer refusal law please see =>http://ezinearticles.com/?Rhode-Island-DUI—DWI-Law-Should-I-Refuse-The-Breathalyzer?&id=486659

Guilty Finding after Trial and appeals de novo

If the defendant is found guilty after trial the sentence will constitute a conviction. If a person is found guilty at trial in district court they can appeal de novo (of new) to the Superior Court and the conviction will be erased and the case will essentially start all over again in the Superior Court.

Obviously, the defendants best result is either a dismissal by the prosecution or an acquittal.
A defendant has five days to file an appeal of a guilty finding after trial or appeal a plea agreement that he / she is unhappy with. In the Superior Court appeal, the defendant has a right to a trial by jury. Whereas, in The District Court a person waives their right to a trial by jury but in exchange for their waiver of their right to a trial by jury has the right to appeal any guilty finding de novo (of new) to the Superior Court. A person charged with a misdemeanor essentially has two bites of the apple so to speak. A defendant can attempt to win at a judge decided trial in District Court and then if they lose they can do it all over again with a jury trial in Superior Court.

What is a “filing” in Rhode Island?

If the defendant takes a not guilty plea or a nolo contendere plea then the case will be “filed” for a year. This is commonly called a “filing”. If the defendant does not get arrested or get in other trouble and complies with the conditions of the filing during the one year period then the case is dismissed and can be easily expunged from a person’s record after the year.

What types of filing are there in Rhode Island

There are two types of filings, not guilty filings and nolo contendere filings. A not Guilty filing is when the defendant maintains his innocence and the case if filed for a year. A not guilty filing is not usually allowed by Judges in the District Court. Not Guilty filings are extremely rare in the District Court. Some judges will not allow not guilty filings as a matter of policy. Not guilty filings are very beneficial to the defendant as the best case scenario short of a dismissal or not guilty finding because if the person is accused of a new crime or violating their filing the state will need to still prove their underlying case.

A nolo contendere filing is when the defendant admits to guilt and the case is filed for a year. The vast majority of filings are nolo contedere filings! A major difference between a not guilty filing and a nolo contendere filing is when a person is violated for a not guilty filing then the state / prosecution must prove guilt at that time. Whereas, if a person is violated for a nolo contendere filing, the judge simply must impose a sentence because the person has already admitted guilt to that offense.

If the person violates his filing by not complying with the conditions of the filing then the persons filing can be revoked by the Court. If a person takes a nolo contendere filing and gets into further trouble, violates the conditions of the filing or is arrested on a new offense then the person will be hailed back into court to be sentenced on the filing. (unless the filing was a not guilty filing which means the prosecution must prove the defendants guilt) There are various conditions that can be put on a filing inluding alcohol and drug counseling, domestic violence counseling or classes, restitution, no contact with the victim and community service.

What implications are there for domestic violence offenses in Rhode Island?

If the underlying charge is for a domestic offense such as domestic assault / domestic vandalism or domestic disorderly conduct then the defendant will be ordered to have no contact with his wife girlfriend or the victim as the case may be. If the defendant violates the no contact order then the defendant will be charged with a separate offense of violating a no contact order as well as violating the conditions of the filing or probation, as a result of the communication.

No Contact Orders in Rhode Island explained

A “no contact order” means that the defendant is precluded from having any contact and or communication with the victim or the person under the protection of the no contact order. This includes but is not limited to letters, emails, text messages or messages delivered through a third party.

In other words if a person is under a no contact order and sees the victim in public they must leave the area immediately and not acknowledge the victims existence. A person cannot even say “hi” if they walk by the victim by chance on the street.

Be very careful! A person can be arrested for violating a no contact order even if the victim initiates the contact and calls the defedant. A person can be charged with breaking a no contact order even if invited by his wife to come back to the marital home.

Even if the victim tells you that the no contact order has been dropped, do not take the victims word for it. You must see the piece of paper signed by the judge dismissing the no contact order before any contact or communication is initiated. A no contact order expires when the sentence period is finished. However, be careful because there may also be a restraining order issued as a reult of a divorce or family court matter or a District Court restraining order.

A person who is on probation or a probation attached to a suspended sentence must be even more vigilante in order to not violate the no contact order. For example, a single phone call made by the defendant to a victim under the protection of a no contact order probably means a minimum of ten 10 days in jail at the ACI. We are not talking about the local town jail but the ACI.

Violation of conditions of filing

Please note, that a person who has a filing can be held for up to ten days at the ACI if arrested for a new charge / crime. A person who is on a filing must be very careful that he / she stays out of troubl.

If the person is violated from the terms and conditions of the filing then hypothetically the filing could become a conviction because that person has already admitted to the charges by pleading nolo contendere and giving up his right to contest the charges. Court costs will be imposed if there is a nolo contendere filing in a criminal case.

Probation in Rhode Island

If a person recieves probation then they will need to abide by the conditions of the probation and agree to keep the peace and be of good behavior. If a person violates his probation by being arrested for a new crime then the person may be held in Jail at the ACI as a probation violater. After ten days a person has the right to a hearing. At the probation violation hearing, the prosecutor must only convince the judge so that the judge is “reasonably satisfied” that the person violated the probation by committing the new offense. Also the person will be prosecuted for the new offense as a separate charge from violating the probation. There is a good chance that if a person is violated for his probation that the probation which was originally not a conviction will now ripen into a conviction.

A probationary period is a time of great risk for a defendant and a defendant must be careful to stay out of trouble!

A person can also be violated for his probation for various infractions that may not be criminal acts but that violate the conditions of probation such as not keeping probation informed of new adresses, leaving the state without permission, not paying court costs or restitution, not properly reporting to the probation officer, etc. When a person is under probation in Rhode Island he or she is essentially is in a contract with the state to keep the peace, be of good behavior and comply with the conditions and rules of probation.

What is a probation with a suspended sentence in Rhode Island?

If the charges are serious or the person has a lengthy criminal record of has already been placed on probation before then in addition to the probation, the judge may attach a suspended sentence. A person who has a suspended sentence is in a period of extreme risk because a new offense could lead to substantial jail time!

A suspended sentence is always a conviction under Rhode Island law. A person with probation and a suspended sentence attached will not spend anytime in prison unless the person violates the conditions of his probation as set forth above.

The period of the suspended sentence is the most time that a person could spend in prison if the person violates the conditions of the probation or commits a new offense. If the person violates the probation, the judge could sentence the person up to the amount of time that is suspended. Please note that the person could get additional sentence and or penalties as a result of the new charge. It is in the defendants best interest to have the period of suspended sentence to be as short as possible. The suspended sentence typically is for the same amount of time as the period of probation.

Please note that if the offense is driving on a suspended license there are special rules that apply that are set forth in the statutes.

Most prosecutors and judges believe that each sentence should be more severe then the last. A person’s first minor offense is likely to lead to only a filing which is the lowest form of penalty in Rhode Island. A person usually will only be allowed one filing.

It is important that this criminal law article be used for informational purposes only and not as a substitute for seeking legal advice from a Rhode Island lawyer.

Rhode Island criminal, dui, divorce, family law, and personal injury law lawyer, David Slepkow has been practicing law for ten years. You can contact David at http://www.slepkowlaw.com or by calling him at 401-437-1100. David Slepkow is a lawyer and partner at Slepkow Slepkow & Associates, Inc. in East providence, Rhode Island. Slepkow Slepkow & Associates, Inc. was established in 1932 and is currently celebrating its 75th anniversary! Attorney, David Slepkow is a member of the Rhode Island (RI) and Massachusetts (MA) Bar Association. David offers free initial consultations and accepts all major credit cards. If necessary, David can arrange weekend and evening consults. David never charges any fee for personal injury case, automobile / auto/ car accidents and slip & fall cases unless sucessfull. David Slepkow is a member of the Family Law Inns of Court and the Rhode Island Trial Lawyers Association. David Practices in the following areas of law: criminal law, DUI & Breathalyzer refusal, divorce & personal injury.

The main way to change your name the quickest is by filing a Petition for a Change of Name. There’s a hard way and an easy way to petition the court to change your name. The hard way is to dig up Form NC-100, NC-110, NC-120, Form CSM-010, and form NC-130 1-by-1 on your own. The easy way is to find a site online that has all the forms as a kit and you should be able to find a kit with instructions. Instructions would help because there’s more to this process.

Once you fill out the forms make sure you have a copy for yourself and a copy to give to the court. The next step is to then go to the court in the county you live and file your papers.

The third step is a bit trickier; you must “Publish the Order to Show Cause”. This means you must call one of the newspapers your court recognizes as a general newspaper (the court house can provide you with a list) and ask them to publish your Order to Show Cause in their newspaper, they know the routine. You must Publish the Order to Show Cause once a week for 4 weeks in a row.

The fourth step is to go to your court date and take the proof of publication from the newspaper. Make sure you get the newspaper with your Order to Show Cause and bring it with you to your court case. You’ll also need to have the Decree Changing Name form that should of came with your kit (Form NC-130). The judge will need to sign off on the Decree Changing Name form this is what you’ll need to change all your legal documents which include your birth certificate, social security card, and passport.

Once you get the Decree Changing Name form signed get a certified copy from the court.

This article was brought to you by Legal Forms Bank .Biz a leading provider of up-to-date legal forms including your state’s legal name change kit, residential lease agreement kit, and last will and testament kit.

I watched a very disturbing and enlightening video about drugs, the CIA, and American governmental corruption last night. The title is CONSPIRACY, THE SECRET HISTORY, SECRET HEARTBEAT OF AMERICA - The C.I.A. & Drugs. New Science Ideas is the producer. Every American should watch this video.

It seems people overseas know more about the CIA than most Americans. Of course there is a reason for this. Our media is censored in the name of “national security” matters. National security, as you will learn, is a subject that shows up in the weirdest places.

The drugging of America costs us more than $16 billion a year and has killed more people than the Vietnam war. Who profits and who is responsible? Follow the money.

Ironically when first lady Nancy Reagan was saying “Just say no to drugs.” the CIA and Barry Seal were bringing them in from Medellin, Colombia. The agency used the cocaine money once sold in the USA to buy and bring arms to the contras to Nicaragua. Oliver North was heavily involved in the fiasco.

Anyone in Mena, Arkansas who tried to expose this circle of corruption, including the head prosecutor, was threatened or killed. When two young men saw a drug drop by the train tracks in Arkansas, they were immediately knocked off. The cover-up ran throughout local and state government. President Clinton was the Governor of Arkansas at that time. He played along keeping quiet and afterward got lots of drug money donated to his presidential campaigns.

President Bush I was no less guilty as former director of the CIA. His watchful eye and reading of the CIA briefings, which he as a former President still reads daily, makes him equally liable during his tenure as Vice President. At least they got that word vice right?

The people who caused the cocaine epidemic that swept the nation during the 1980s wasn’t African Americans in the ghetto. Many of them in those days could barely cash a paycheck, much less smuggle drugs via planes into the country. When the USA has satellite technology capable of reading the writing on a golf ball, there should be no difficulty tracking down the likes of drug smugglers and Bin Laden. That is unless you are covertly working with them.

A three-year investigation into the life and times of Barry Seal, one of the most famous CIA agents and successful drug smugglers in America’s history, revealed the extent of governmental corruption throughout America.

When Mena, Arkansas was brought up during the Oliver North trial, suddenly everything went into closed quarters away from the public eye. Why? What does the government know that it doesn’t want the American people to know?

When international drug distribution organizations are integrated vertically throughout our government, there is room for concern. Dan Harmon was involved in the obstruction of justice locally n Saline County, Arkansas. He was indicted and found guilty on 5 of 11 charges. Sucking off the tit of shameful governmental secret operations, Harmon was never charged for murder in the two train deaths. After his release from prison, Harmon was promoted. I guess it pays to be connected and play along.

New Orleans attorney Sam Dalton poignantly said, “When the government involves itself in activities like the CIA and starts averting natural events and the natural course of history, that is where the government itself becomes the criminal. This whole thing is hiding in plain sight. If you want a scandal, investigate retired DEA agents net worth and put it together. If the American people don’t make the government start behaving soon, we’re going to reach the point of no return.”

With Barry Seal and the CIA working the drug trade, they found in the deep south some compliant and cooperative governors. Hence the list of later Presidents elected from the south.

The FBI went to the New Orleans police office and seized the trunk and walked out with it, when Barry Seal died. The state judge had to back up attorney Sam Dalton and hold the FBI in contempt of court to get what evidence it needed for discovery. Sam Dalton also wanted to subpoena the CIA, but was unable to do so.

Jaws isn’t over until the sheriff meets the shark. Mena, Arkansas proved to be the biggest drop point for drugs in the entire country, a $130 billion dollar industry. It’s rather easy apparently to finance a governmental covert operation, when all airport personnel are willing to play along. The secret wars of the CIA 1981-1987 is written about by Woodward. The Clintons were partners in power.

To see the real culprits look around the periphery - not the smoking gun, but the bent twigs. Note the deaths, firings, threats, and attacks upon people in the know. Dan Lasater, a convicted drug dealer, was a big Clinton supporter. Jerry Parks, the head of than governor Clinton’s security detail, was killed in a hail of gunfire after telling associates he was a dead man one month after Vince Foster died. Arkansas criminal investigator Russell Welch got poisonous military grade anthrax sprayed in his face for his probe into the coverup.

Arkansas state coroner Bobby Malick (an Egyptian) played right along claiming he never made a mistake in 7000 autopsies. When the two young men who were killed on the train tracks for seeing a drug drop, Malick claimed it was a suicide. When the parents didn’t believe it, he decided to tell them the boys had high amounts of marijuana in their systems. However the 2nd autopsy revealed that stabbings had occurred along with a bruise to the face from what looked like the butt of a rifle. The boys lungs had 3 times the normal amount of blood in them, which indicated they were not killed by the impact of a train.

Sheriff Jim Stead, another participant in the coverup, called it a thorough investigation. The boy’s mother disagreed considering her son’s foot was left laying on the train tracks for 2 days. The green tarp seen by many after the impact of the train also brought into question a government cover-up.

Prosecutor Jean Duffey was one of the few would didn’t play along. She was threatened and eventually run out of town. She thought her life was in danger and moved to Houston, TX where she now teaches high school geometry. Duffey was appointed to head a federally funded drug task force in Arkansas. The day she was appointed Gary Arnold walked in and told her she was not to use the task force to investigate any public officials.

Duffey was put in charge of half-a-dozen under cover agents. They couldn’t get much above street level buying, but when they started connecting public officials to protecting the drug dealers Dan Harmon’s name came up immediately and most frequently. The train deaths became the most famous unsolved mystery in Arkansas history. It received national attention and 1,000 newspapers wrote about it. Possible witnesses however were turning up dead.

Drug drops from low flying airplanes, which local residents reported hearing many nights, were never investigated by any law enforcement agency in the district. The drugs were being dropped in the same vicinity where Kevin & Don had been murdered along the train tracks.

Prosecutor Jean Duffey was the object of a smear campaign. Basically she was getting too close to the 7th judicial district. Hence she was fired in order to cover their asses. In 1991, drug task force secret agent Scott Loellen quit, saying “There is just too much dirt behind the scenes.” He served Saline, Grant, and Hot Springs counties. He later bad mouthed the drug task force saying, “That district is immersed in a reign of corruption that has important and powerful connections to political, judicial, and law enforcement officials.”

As an under cover officer, Scott gathered evidence of illegal activity, but for some reason the drug task force chose to ignore him. He quit because of the firing of Jean Duffey, the drug task force administrator.

In June 1990, Dan Harmon became the district’s prosecutor elect. Harmon’s first news conference and interview was entirely used to discredit Jean Duffey, who was disposed of and forced to flee to Houston, TX as her life was in danger.

Prosecutor Dan Harmon was on the tracks the night the boys were murdered. State police also were not doing their job. The mothers of the deceased boys were promised convictions in the 1990 federal investigation, when suddenly Chuck Banks shut down the investigation in June of 1991.

Other bits and pieces of evidence linking it all together was the fact that in the 1980s a former top CIA official kept a 2nd home in Medellin, Colombia.

Some other juicy tidbits of information. Oliver North’s 1st national program office was at Laguna Airfield, where 1400 lbs of cocaine was found on the runway.

Southern Air Transport, owned and operated by the CIA, provided the agency a subcontractor for plausible deniability while they dealt in drugs and arms trade. The privatization of American intelligence is the way the agency works.

The British version of 60 minutes, The Big Story, showed the trail of drug smuggling and gun running that led to the door of the White House. It exposed the blundering government coverups spanning seven investigations and some long frustrating years. The show revealing the cocaine connection was immediately banned in the USA within hours of its release.

During the days of the Oliver North trial, some 500 documents were shredded over 3 days. All our enemies knew it, but North wanted to conceal and keep it from Congress. Even surfers in Nicaragua named a surf spot after him do to the agency’s base there. As for Mena, Arkansas, it was home to Operation Black Eagle, the most massive covert operation in U.S. history.

1101 Mena St. is the local to the secret history of our life and times as a nation trafficking in drugs and arms. It is a small obscure town in western Arkansas, with a population around 5,000 people. With no tower and monitoring of flights, Barry Seal found Mena to be the perfect place to fly in and out without being recorded. Barry brought up to $5 billion of cocaine into the USA during the 1980s. Mena was where he based his cargo airline and parked his one of three C123 planes that made trips to Colombia and Nicaragua.

The mere mention of Mena has been sending chills down the spines of government propaganda officials for years. It’s nice to see the Democrats and Republicans work together on something. The doping of America is truly a bipartisan coverup.

Paul Davis is a life purpose and love coach (professional & relational), worldwide minister, change master, and FL real estate agent.

Paul is the author of several books including Breakthrough for a Broken Heart; Adultery: 101 Reasons Not to Cheat; Are You Ready for True Love; Stop Lusting & Start Living; Waves of God; Supernatural Fire; Poems that Propel the Planet; and God vs. Religion.

Paul’s compassion for people & passion to travel has taken him to over 50 countries of the world where he has had a tremendous impact. Paul has served in many war-torn, impoverished and tsunami stricken regions of the earth. His Dream-Maker Inc. is building dreams, breaking limitations & reviving nations.

Paul’s Breakthrough Seminars inspire, revive, awaken, impregnate with purpose, impart the fire of desire, catapult people into a new level of self-awareness, facilitate destiny discovery and dream fulfillment.

Contact Paul to minister, speak at your event or for life coaching:

RevivingNations@yahoo.com, 407-284-1705.

http://www.DreamMakerMinistries.com

http://www.CreativeCommunications.TV